Article info
PDFResponse
Pros and cons of prosent as an alternative to traditional consent in medical research
- Correspondence to Dr Vasiliki Nataly Rahimzadeh, Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; vrahim{at}stanford.edu
Citation
Pros and cons of prosent as an alternative to traditional consent in medical research
Publication history
- Received May 12, 2020
- Accepted May 13, 2020
- First published June 22, 2020.
Online issue publication
April 13, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (13 April 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Blockchain, consent and prosent for medical research
- Blockchain, health disparities and global health
- From blockchain technology to global health equity: can cryptocurrencies finance universal health coverage?
- Frauds in scientific research and how to possibly overcome them
- Blockchain technology for immunisation data storage in India: opportunities for population health innovation
- Future of blockchain in healthcare: potential to improve the accessibility, security and interoperability of electronic health records
- Clinical risk prediction models: the canary in the coalmine for artificial intelligence in healthcare?
- Urban monitoring, evaluation and application of COVID-19 listed vaccine effectiveness: a health code blockchain study
- Bitcoin technology could take a bite out of NHS data problem
- The way forward after COVID-19 vaccination: vaccine passports with blockchain to protect personal privacy