Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Impact of ectogenesis on the medicalisation of pregnancy and childbirth
- Correspondence to Victoria Adkins, Department of Law and Criminology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham TW20 0EX, UK; victoria.adkins.2018{at}live.rhul.ac.uk
Citation
Impact of ectogenesis on the medicalisation of pregnancy and childbirth
Publication history
- Received December 4, 2019
- Revised May 25, 2020
- Accepted May 27, 2020
- First published July 9, 2020.
Online issue publication
April 13, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (13 April 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Partial ectogenesis: freedom, equality and political perspective
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise
- Reviewing the womb
- Gestation, equality and freedom: ectogenesis as a political perspective
- Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications
- Artificial wombs, birth and ‘birth’: a response to Romanis
- Subjects of ectogenesis: are ‘gestatelings’ fetuses, newborns or neither?
- Regulating abortion after ectogestation
- Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetuses)