Article Text
Abstract
My paper challenges an influential distinction between pain and suffering put forward by physician-ethicist, Eric Cassell. I argue that Cassell’s distinction is philosophically untenable because he contrasts suffering with an outdated theory of pain. In particular, Cassell focuses on one type of pain, the interpretation of nociception induced by noxious stimuli such as heat or sharp objects; yet since the late 1970s, pain scientists have rendered both nociception and noxious stimuli unnecessary for pain. I argue that this discrepancy between Cassell’s distinction and pain science produces three philosophical problems for his distinction: first, he frames his distinction too generally, concentrating on only one type of pain (interpreted nociception) to the neglect of others, such as neuropathy; second, it is possible that Cassell’s understanding of pain may include suffering; and third, Cassell gives examples of pain and suffering manifesting independently of each other, but it is possible that these cases may instead exemplify differences between nociceptive and non-nociceptive types of pain. Due to these problems, I conclude that Cassell’s distinction currently lacks a difference. I call for new efforts to articulate the differences, if any, between pain and suffering.
- end-of-life
- general medicine / internal medicine
- pain management
- palliative care
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors I confirm that this manuscript is solely my own work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement There are no data in this work.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- An intellectual history of suffering in the Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 1978–2014
- Part of pain labelled neuropathic in rheumatic disease might be rather nociplastic
- Neuropathic pain: diagnosis and treatment
- Pain as metaphor: metaphor and medicine
- Complex regional pain syndrome
- Expert conference on cancer pain assessment and classification — the need for international consensus: working proposals on international standards
- Neuropathic pain: mechanisms and their clinical implications
- Diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain
- Neuropathic pain treatment and research: experiences from the United Kingdom mission to Afghanistan and future prospects
- Pain in elite athletes — neurophysiological, biomechanical and psychosocial considerations: a narrative review