Article info
PDFCommentary
Disentangling the individualisation argument against non-medical egg freezing from feminist critiques
- Correspondence to Dr Lisa Campo-Engelstein, Institute for Bioethics & Health Humanities, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77550, USA; licampoe{at}utmb.edu
Citation
Disentangling the individualisation argument against non-medical egg freezing from feminist critiques
Publication history
- Received January 4, 2021
- Accepted January 15, 2021
- First published February 1, 2021.
Online issue publication
February 22, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (1 February 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Arguments on thin ice: on non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments
- Advancing technologies as both our saviour and our doom
- Discussing social hierarchies and the importance of genetic ties: a commentary on Petersen
- Beyond individualisation: towards a more contextualised understanding of women’s social egg freezing experiences
- Individual solutions to social problems
- Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion
- Non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments: reply to Moen, Segers and Campo-Engelstein
- Effectiveness of social egg freezing: protocol for systematic review and meta-analyses
- Fertility considerations prior to conservative management of gynecologic cancers
- ‘Social’ egg freezing and the UK's statutory storage time limits