Disentangling the individualisation argument against non-medical egg freezing from feminist critiques
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors LC-E is the sole author of this work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology was the first to condone NMEF in 2012 in part due to cultural values.6
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Arguments on thin ice: on non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments
- Advancing technologies as both our saviour and our doom
- Discussing social hierarchies and the importance of genetic ties: a commentary on Petersen
- Beyond individualisation: towards a more contextualised understanding of women’s social egg freezing experiences
- Individual solutions to social problems
- Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion
- Non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments: reply to Moen, Segers and Campo-Engelstein
- Effectiveness of social egg freezing: protocol for systematic review and meta-analyses
- Fertility considerations prior to conservative management of gynecologic cancers
- ‘Social’ egg freezing and the UK's statutory storage time limits