Article info
Commentary
Discussing social hierarchies and the importance of genetic ties: a commentary on Petersen
- Correspondence to Seppe Segers, Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Universiteit Gent, Ghent 9000, Belgium; seppe.segers{at}ugent.be
Citation
Discussing social hierarchies and the importance of genetic ties: a commentary on Petersen
Publication history
- Received January 6, 2021
- Accepted January 15, 2021
- First published January 22, 2021.
Online issue publication
February 22, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 January 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Arguments on thin ice: on non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments
- Advancing technologies as both our saviour and our doom
- Individual solutions to social problems
- Non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments: reply to Moen, Segers and Campo-Engelstein
- Disentangling the individualisation argument against non-medical egg freezing from feminist critiques
- Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion
- Beyond individualisation: towards a more contextualised understanding of women’s social egg freezing experiences
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Effectiveness of social egg freezing: protocol for systematic review and meta-analyses
- Gestation, equality and freedom: ectogenesis as a political perspective