The authority of bioethics as a field of inquiry and of bioethicists as scholars with a distinctive expertise is being questioned on various fronts. Sarah Franklin’s 2019 Nature commentary ‘Ethical research – the long and bumpy road from shirked to shared’ is the latest example . In this paper, we respond to these challenges by focusing on two key issues. First, we discuss the theory and practice of bioethics. We argue that both of these endeavours are fundamental components of this field of inquiry and that bioethics cannot be reduced to the contribution that it makes to the production of biopolicy, as Franklin suggests. Second, we contend that bioethicists have distinctive skills and knowledge that place them at an epistemic advantage in discussing normative questions. Hence, we reject views that deny the specific contribution that bioethicists can bring to assessing the ethics and governance of science and technology. We conclude by arguing that—despite formal and substantive differences between disciplines—philosophers, social scientists and other scholars should join forces and engage in critical friendships rather than turf wars to move towards the just governance of science and technology.
- philosophical ethics
- public policy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Twitter @silviacamporesi, @giuli_cavaliere
Correction notice This article has been updated since it was first published online. Giulia Cavaliere's affiliation has been updated.
Contributors All authors contributed equally in the conceptualisation, writing and revising of this paper.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement There are no data in this work.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- A bioethics for all seasons
- The transformation of (bio)ethics expertise in a world of ethical pluralism
- UNESCO Global Ethics Observatory: database on ethics related legislation and guidelines
- Unesco’s Global Ethics Observatory
- Science fiction in bioethics: a role for feminist narratology
- Bioethics and health and human rights: a critical view
- Empirical research in bioethical journals. A quantitative analysis
- Whereto speculative bioethics? Technological visions and future simulations in a science fictional culture
- Digital bioethics: introducing new methods for the study of bioethical issues
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?