Article info
PDFConcise argument
Advancing technologies as both our saviour and our doom
- Correspondence to Dr Jesse Wall, Faculty of Law, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand; jesse.wall{at}auckland.ac.nz
Citation
Advancing technologies as both our saviour and our doom
Publication history
- First published February 22, 2021.
Online issue publication
January 09, 2022
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Arguments on thin ice: on non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments
- Disentangling the individualisation argument against non-medical egg freezing from feminist critiques
- Discussing social hierarchies and the importance of genetic ties: a commentary on Petersen
- Individual solutions to social problems
- Non-medical egg freezing and individualisation arguments: reply to Moen, Segers and Campo-Engelstein
- Beyond individualisation: towards a more contextualised understanding of women’s social egg freezing experiences
- Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion
- More than an idea: why ectogestation should become a concrete option
- A libertarian case for mandatory vaccination
- Abortion and Ectogenesis: Moral Compromise