Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
John Rawls’s ‘just savings’ principle is among the better-known attempts to outline how we should balance the claims of the present with the claims of the future generations on resources. A central element of Rawls’s approach involves endorsing a sufficientarian approach, where our central obligation is to ensure ‘the conditions needed to establish and to preserve a just basic structure’.1
This engaging paper by Christian Munthe, Davide Fumagalli and Erik Malmqvist (‘the authors’) does not explicitly mention Rawls’s work on this issue.2 Still, there are parallels in their aim to generate a ‘sustainability principle’ for healthcare systems. The authors defend the broadening of our focus to the relations between rounds—particularly, how decisions in one period can affect our choice range in the next, whereas current principles for allocating healthcare resources operate within ‘allocation rounds’. Where Rawls is concerned about future generations, the authors’ concern is with future sets of patients. Our present decisions may generate system ‘dynamics’ which are either positive—where ‘more resources per health need’ become available—or negative—where (otherwise justified) decisions taken now leave us with less bang for our buck in the future. The paper’s important and compelling central claim is that we have an obligation …
Footnotes
Contributors I am the sole author.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Access to healthcare for men and women with disabilities in the UK: secondary analysis of cross-sectional data
- Sustainability principle for the ethics of healthcare resource allocation
- Evaluating the association between unmet healthcare needs and subsequent clinical outcomes: protocol for the Addressing Post-Intensive Care Syndrome-01 (APICS-01) multicentre cohort study
- Tools for guiding interventions to address patient - perceived multidimensional unmet healthcare needs in palliative care: systematic literature review
- Emergency healthcare needs in the Lavender Hill suburb of Cape Town, South Africa: a cross-sectional, community - based household survey
- Regional South Australia Health (RESONATE) survey: study protocol
- Employment status and unmet dental care needs in South Korea: a population - based panel study
- Athlete medicine applied in a pandemic: disparities among athletes and performers reveal the need for a true ‘ revolution ’ in health care
- Determinants of undergoing thyroid cancer screening in Korean women: a cross-sectional analysis from the K - Stori 2016
- Child protection medical assessments: why do we do them