Article info
PDFCommentary
Sex robots for older adults with disabilities: reply to critics
- Correspondence to Dr Nancy S Jecker, Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; nsjecker{at}uw.edu
Citation
Sex robots for older adults with disabilities: reply to critics
Publication history
- Received December 7, 2020
- Accepted December 9, 2020
- First published January 17, 2021.
Online issue publication
January 22, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (17 January 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities
- Sex robot fantasies
- Comment on ‘I, Sex Robot: the health implications of the sex robot industry’
- Robots and sexual ethics
- Commentary on Jecker
- Are sex robots enough?
- Considering sex robots for older adults with cognitive impairments
- I, Sex Robot: the health implications of the sex robot industry
- Society must consider risks of sex robots, report warns
- Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review