Article info
PDFOriginal research
Reflective disequilibrium: a critical evaluation of the complete lives framework for healthcare rationing
- Correspondence to Mr Xavier Symons, Plunkett Centre for Ethics, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia; xavier.symons{at}acu.edu.au
Citation
Reflective disequilibrium: a critical evaluation of the complete lives framework for healthcare rationing
Publication history
- Received June 25, 2020
- Revised September 29, 2020
- Accepted October 28, 2020
- First published December 17, 2020.
Online issue publication
November 15, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 January 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Methods and principles in biomedical ethics
- Justification of principles for healthcare priority setting: the relevance and roles of empirical studies exploring public values
- The justificatory power of moral experience
- Three pitfalls of accountable healthcare rationing
- Which factors should be included in triage? An online survey of the attitudes of the UK general public to pandemic triage dilemmas
- The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy
- The ethical canary: narrow reflective equilibrium as a source of moral justification in healthcare priority-setting
- Specification and other methods for determining morally relevant facts
- Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them?
- What do patients value in their hospital care? A response to Joffe et al