Article info
PDFCommentary
Sustainability, equal treatment, and temporal neutrality
- Correspondence to Dr Govind Persad, College of Law, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80220, USA; gpersad{at}alumni.stanford.edu
Citation
Sustainability, equal treatment, and temporal neutrality
Publication history
- Received December 22, 2020
- Accepted December 24, 2020
- First published January 17, 2021.
Online issue publication
January 22, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (17 January 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage
Other content recommended for you
- Sustainability principle for the ethics of healthcare resource allocation
- How the past matters for the future: a luck egalitarian sustainability principle for healthcare resource allocation
- Sustainable healthcare resource allocation, grounding theories and operational principles: response to our commentators
- Promoting the sustainability of healthcare resources with existing ethical principles: scarce COVID-19 medications, vaccines and principled parsimony
- Solidarity, sustainability and medical ethics
- Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow
- The predictive value of self assessed general, physical, and mental health on functional decline and mortality in older adults
- Positive rights, negative rights and health care
- Moral ambivalence towards the Cancer Drugs Fund
- Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity