Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵Some defend this tendency. See Bloche MG. The invention of health law. Calif. L. Rev. 2003;91:247, who argues that “the anguish of identified persons” should often override “population-level health maximization.” See also Goodin, op. cit. (observing that “one explanation for why too many resources are devoted to prolonging life pointlessly for terminally ill patients is that those patients are right in front of the attending physician, whereas others on whom those resources might be better spent may often not be”)
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Sustainability principle for the ethics of healthcare resource allocation
- How the past matters for the future: a luck egalitarian sustainability principle for healthcare resource allocation
- Sustainable healthcare resource allocation, grounding theories and operational principles: response to our commentators
- Promoting the sustainability of healthcare resources with existing ethical principles: scarce COVID-19 medications, vaccines and principled parsimony
- Solidarity, sustainability and medical ethics
- Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow
- The predictive value of self assessed general, physical, and mental health on functional decline and mortality in older adults
- Positive rights, negative rights and health care
- Moral ambivalence towards the Cancer Drugs Fund
- Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity