Article info
PDFExtended essay
Three models for the regulation of polygenic scores in reproduction
- Correspondence to Professor Julian Savulescu, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK; julian.savulescu{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Three models for the regulation of polygenic scores in reproduction
Publication history
- Received June 10, 2020
- Revised November 30, 2020
- Accepted December 6, 2020
- First published January 18, 2021.
Online issue publication
November 29, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (18 January 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Understanding polygenic models, their development and the potential application of polygenic scores in healthcare
- Calibration of polygenic risk scores is required prior to clinical implementation: results of three common cancers in UKB
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- Does urbanicity modify the relationship between a polygenic risk score for depression and mental health symptoms? Cross-sectional evidence from the observational HUNT Study in Norway
- The impact of a panel of 18 SNPs on breast cancer risk in women attending a UK familial screening clinic: a case–control study
- Genetic risk, incident stroke, and the benefits of adhering to a healthy lifestyle: cohort study of 306 473 UK Biobank participants
- Association of retinal optical coherence tomography metrics and polygenic risk scores with cognitive function and future cognitive decline
- Highlighting the importance of healthy sleep patterns in the risk of adult asthma under the combined effects of genetic susceptibility: a large-scale prospective cohort study of 455 405 participants
- Recontacting biobank participants to collect lifestyle, behavioural and cognitive information via online questionnaires: lessons from a pilot study within FinnGen
- Realistic expectations are key to realising the benefits of polygenic scores