Article info
PDFExtended essay
Justifying risk-related standards of capacity via autonomy alone
- Correspondence to Dr Abraham Graber, Philosophy and Classics, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA; agraber{at}gmail.com
Citation
Justifying risk-related standards of capacity via autonomy alone
Publication history
- Received July 23, 2020
- Revised November 7, 2020
- Accepted November 16, 2020
- First published January 5, 2021.
Online issue publication
January 07, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Using coercion in mental disorders or risking the patient’s death? An analysis of the protocols of a clinical ethics committee and a derived decision algorithm
- Temporising and respect for patient self-determination
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- The Ulysses contract in obstetrics: a woman's choices before and during labour
- Ditching decision-making capacity
- Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent
- Obligation for transparency regarding treating physician credentials at academic health centres
- Fostering relational autonomy in end-of-life care: a procedural approach and three-dimensional decision-making model
- Not so new directions in the law of consent? Examining Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account