Article info
PDFExtended essay
Congenitally decorticate children’s potential and rights
- Correspondence to Dr Anna-Karin Margareta Andersson, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso,Po. Box 6050 Langnes N-9037, Troms, Norway; anna-karin.m.andersson{at}uit.no
Citation
Congenitally decorticate children’s potential and rights
Publication history
- Received February 25, 2020
- Revised July 11, 2020
- Accepted July 12, 2020
- First published September 3, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 07, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Thalamic proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vegetative state induced by traumatic brain injury
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Functional neuroimaging and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from vegetative patients
- Prevalence and characteristics of patients in a vegetative state in Dutch nursing homes
- How family caregivers' medical and moral assumptions influence decision making for patients in the vegetative state: a qualitative interview study
- Acknowledging awareness: informing families of individual research results for patients in the vegetative state
- Preserved consciousness in vegetative and minimal conscious states: systematic review and meta-analysis
- Can electromyography objectively detect voluntary movement in disorders of consciousness?
- Ethical issues in diagnosis and management of patients in the permanent vegetative state
- Current controversies and irresolvable disagreement: the case of Vincent Lambert and the role of ‘dissensus’