Article info
PDFCurrent controversy
Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
- Correspondence to Adam Omelianchuk, Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; omelianchuk{at}gmail.com
Citation
Dilemma for appeals to the moral significance of birth
Publication history
- Received August 7, 2020
- Revised September 21, 2020
- Accepted September 23, 2020
- First published October 26, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 07, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Birth, meaningful viability and abortion
- Why there is no dilemma for the birth strategy: a response to Bobier and Omelianchuk
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- The pearl of the ‘Pro-Life’ movement? Reflections on the Kermit Gosnell controversy
- Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and ‘after-birth abortion’
- The moral status of babies
- The common premise for uncommon conclusions
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Does birth matter?
- Of course the baby should live: against ‘after-birth abortion’