Article info
PDFOriginal research
Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice: epistemic duties and the phenomenological approach
- Correspondence to Anna Drożdżowicz, Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway; anna.drozdzowicz{at}gmail.com
Citation
Epistemic injustice in psychiatric practice: epistemic duties and the phenomenological approach
Publication history
- Received July 6, 2020
- Revised December 11, 2020
- Accepted December 13, 2020
- First published February 19, 2021.
Online issue publication
November 29, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 February 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Epistemic injustice, children and mental illness
- Epistemic injustice in healthcare encounters: evidence from chronic fatigue syndrome
- Patients, clinicians and open notes: information blocking as a case of epistemic injustice
- From hermeneutics to heteroglossia: ‘The Patient’s View’ revisited
- Need for patient-developed concepts of empowerment to rectify epistemic injustice and advance person-centred care
- More than consent for ethical open-label placebo research
- How to identify epistemic injustice in global health research funding practices: a decolonial guide
- Psychedelic injustice: should bioethics tune in to the voices of psychedelic-using communities?
- Contributory injustice in psychiatry
- Testimonial injustice: discounting women’s voices in health care priority setting