Article info
PDFOriginal research
The time has come to extend the 14-day limit
- Correspondence to Sophia McCully, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK; sophia.mccully{at}kcl.ac.uk
Citation
The time has come to extend the 14-day limit
Publication history
- Received May 6, 2020
- Revised November 22, 2020
- Accepted November 29, 2020
- First published February 2, 2021.
Online issue publication
November 29, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (2 February 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- Why we should not extend the 14-day rule
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Research Ethics, Science Policy, and Four Contexts for the Stem Cell Debate
- A brief and personal history of ‘what’s in a name’ in reproductive genetics
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Potentiality of embryonic stem cells: an ethical problem even with alternative stem cell sources
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making
- The moral value of induced pluripotent stem cells: a Japanese bioethics perspective on human embryo research