Article info
PDFOriginal research
Is there room for privacy in medical crowdfunding?
- Correspondence to Dr Jeremy Snyder, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada; jcs12{at}sfu.ca
Citation
Is there room for privacy in medical crowdfunding?
Publication history
- Received July 6, 2020
- Revised September 17, 2020
- Accepted September 22, 2020
- First published November 18, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 07, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Ethical implications of medical crowdfunding: the case of Charlie Gard
- Appealing to the crowd: ethical justifications in Canadian medical crowdfunding campaigns
- Spatially exploring the intersection of socioeconomic status and Canadian cancer-related medical crowdfunding campaigns
- Medical crowdfunding in China: empirics and ethics
- Privacy, confidentiality and abortion statistics: a question of public interest?
- ‘I haven’t met them, I don’t have any trust in them. It just feels like a big unknown’: a qualitative study exploring the determinants of consent to use Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority registry data in research
- Impact of privacy legislation on the number and characteristics of people who are recruited for research: a randomised controlled trial
- Crowdfunding for health research: a qualitative evidence synthesis and a pilot programme
- GMC confidentiality guidance 2017
- Protecting health privacy even when privacy is lost