Communicating an unfavourable prognosis while maintaining patient hope represents a critical challenge for healthcare professionals (HPs). Duty requires respect for the right to patient autonomy while at the same time not doing harm by causing hopelessness and demoralisation. In some cases, the need for therapeutic privilege is discussed. The primary objectives of this study were to explore HPs’ perceptions of hope in the prognosis communication and investigate how they interpret and operationalise key ethical principles. Sixteen qualitative semistructured interviews with HPs from different positions and experience, including doctors and nurses in four different departments (intensive care, oncology, palliative care, rehabilitation), were conducted in the Ticino Cantonal Hospital, Switzerland. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. HPs defined prognosis and patient hope as interdependent concepts related to future perspectives for subjective quality of life. Two main factors allow HPs to maximise the benefits and minimise the harm of their communication: respecting the patient’s timing and sharing the patient’s wishes. Time is required to reframe needs and expectations. Furthermore, communication needs to be shared by HPs, patients and their relatives to build common awareness and promote a person-centred approach to prognosis. In this process, interprofessional collaboration is key: doctors and nurses are complementary and can together guarantee that patients and relatives receive information in the most appropriate form when they need it. Organisational aspects and the HPs’ emotional difficulties, particularly in coping with their own despair, are barriers to effective communication that need further investigation.
- professional - professional relationship
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- How should the ‘privilege’ in therapeutic privilege be conceived when considering the decision-making process for patients with borderline capacity?
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity-enhancing care approach
- Evolving legal responses to dependence on families in New Zealand and Singapore healthcare
- Advance care planning for patients with chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review of preferences and practices
- Advance care planning discussions among residents of long term care and designated assisted living: experience from Calgary, Alberta
- The diverse impact of advance care planning: a long-term follow-up study on patients’ and relatives’ experiences
- Advance care plans and hospitalized frail older adults: a systematic review
- Which moral barriers and facilitators do physicians encounter in advance care planning conversations about the end of life of persons with dementia? A meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies
- Advance care planning in COPD: guidance development for healthcare professionals
- Discussing motherhood when the oncological prognosis is dire: ethical considerations for physicians