Article info
PDFOriginal research
Against the strengthened impairment argument: never-born fetuses have no FLO to deprive
- Correspondence to Dr Alex R Gillham, Department of Philosophy, Saint Bonaventure University, Saint Bonaventure, NY 14778, USA; argillham{at}icloud.com
Citation
Against the strengthened impairment argument: never-born fetuses have no FLO to deprive
Publication history
- Received June 11, 2020
- Revised July 9, 2020
- Accepted July 11, 2020
- First published August 24, 2020.
Online issue publication
November 29, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (24 August 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Strengthening the impairment argument against abortion
- Strengthened impairment argument: restating Marquis?
- MIP does not save the impairment argument against abortion: a reply to Blackshaw and Hendricks
- Fine-tuning the impairment argument
- The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Strong's objections to the future of value account
- Fetal alcohol syndrome: a prospective national surveillance study
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Abortion and human nature