Article info
PDFOriginal research
Moral distress and moral residue experienced by transplant coordinators
- Correspondence to Dr Ya'arit Bokek-Cohen, School of Nursing, The Academic College of Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Tel Aviv, Postal code 6161001, Israel; ybokek{at}gmail.com
Citation
Moral distress and moral residue experienced by transplant coordinators
Publication history
- Received May 22, 2019
- Revised February 17, 2020
- Accepted June 4, 2020
- First published July 28, 2020.
Online issue publication
November 29, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (28 July 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation
- Towards collective moral resilience: the potential of communities of practice during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond
- Join the Lone Kidney Club: incentivising live organ donation
- Conscientious objection and moral distress: a relational ethics case study of MAiD in Canada
- Moral distress in veterinarians
- Self-interest, self-abnegation and self-esteem: towards a new moral economy of non-directed kidney donation
- Usability assessment of an interactive health technology for kidney living donors: protocol for a prospective cross-sectional survey
- May I have your uterus? The contribution of considering complexities preceding live uterus transplantation
- Unrelated living organ donation: ULTRA needs to go
- The cost of autonomy: estimates from recent advances in living donor kidney transplantation