Article info
PDFOriginal research
Conflict before the courtroom: challenging cognitive biases in critical decision-making
- Correspondence to Dr Harleen Kaur Johal, Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK; harleenkaurjohal{at}gmail.com
Citation
Conflict before the courtroom: challenging cognitive biases in critical decision-making
Publication history
- Received March 2, 2020
- Revised May 28, 2020
- Accepted June 3, 2020
- First published July 6, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 07, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Is providing elective ventilation in the best interests of potential donors?
- Ethical conflicts during the process of deciding about ICU admission: an empirically driven ethical analysis
- Researching about us without us: exploring research participation and the politics of disability rights in the context of the Mental Capacity Act 2005
- Reducing administrative burden by implementing a core set of quality indicators in the ICU: a multicentre longitudinal intervention study
- Exploring physician approaches to conflict resolution in end-of-life decisions in the adult intensive care unit: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative research
- Readiness for transfer: a mixed-methods study on ICU transfers of care
- Understanding ethical climate, moral distress, and burnout: a novel tool and a conceptual framework
- Drawing the line in clinical treatment of companion animals: recommendations from an ethics working party
- An unblinkered view of best interests