Article info
PDFOriginal research
Why unethical papers should be retracted
- Correspondence to Dr William Bülow, Department of Philosophy, Stockholms Universitet, 104 05 Stockholm, Sweden; william.bulow{at}philosophy.su.se
Citation
Why unethical papers should be retracted
Publication history
- Received February 13, 2020
- Revised May 25, 2020
- Accepted June 1, 2020
- First published August 13, 2020.
Online issue publication
November 29, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (13 August 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008
- Against the use and publication of contemporary unethical research: the case of Chinese transplant research
- Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018
- Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central
- Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
- Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
- Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
- Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data
- Poor visibility of retracted articles: a problem that should no longer be ignored
- Improving biomedical journals’ ethical policies: the case of research misconduct