Article info
PDFOriginal research
Valid consent to medical treatment
- Correspondence to Professor Emma Cave, Durham Law School, Durham University, Durham, UK; emma.cave{at}durham.ac.uk
Citation
Valid consent to medical treatment
Publication history
- Received April 9, 2020
- Revised May 12, 2020
- Accepted May 15, 2020
- First published June 23, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 07, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Not so new directions in the law of consent? Examining Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board
- Guideline for obtaining valid consent for gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures
- Deprescribing: is the law on your side?
- One step forward, two steps back? The GMC, the common law and ‘informed’ consent
- The ethics of consent during labour and birth: episiotomies
- Professional-patient relationships and informed consent
- Consent in the time of COVID-19
- Qualitative documentary analysis of guidance on information provision and consent for the introduction of innovative invasive procedures including surgeries within NHS organisations’ policies in England and Wales
- Opt-out paradigms for deceased organ donation are ethically incoherent
- Informed consent for paediatric clinical trials in Europe