Article info
PDFExtended essay
Three pitfalls of accountable healthcare rationing
- Correspondence to Professor Tiit Mathiesen, Department of Neurosurgery and Dept of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2200 Kobenhavn, Denmark; tiit.illimar.mathiesen{at}regionh.dk
Citation
Three pitfalls of accountable healthcare rationing
Publication history
- Received September 24, 2020
- Revised November 24, 2020
- Accepted December 7, 2020
- First published January 13, 2021.
Online issue publication
November 29, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (13 January 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The development of “medical futility”: towards a procedural approach based on the role of the medical profession
- Doctors’ perceptions of how resource limitations relate to futility in end-of-life decision making: a qualitative analysis
- Principlist approach to multiple heart valve replacements for patients with intravenous drug use-induced endocarditis
- Kant on euthanasia and the duty to die: clearing the air
- Rationing, inefficiency and the role of clinicians
- COVID-19 pandemic, the scarcity of medical resources, community-centred medicine and discrimination against persons with disabilities
- Prescribing cannabis: freedom, autonomy, and values
- The rationing debate: Rationing within the NHS should be explicit: The case for
- Evaluating a patient's request for life-prolonging treatment: an ethical framework
- Second thoughts about who is first: the medical triage of violent perpetrators and their victims