Article info
PDFOriginal research
Conscientious participants and the ethical dimensions of physician support for legalised voluntary assisted dying
- Correspondence to Jodhi Rutherford, Australian Cente for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Law, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 4001; jodhi.rutherford{at}qut.edu.au
Citation
Conscientious participants and the ethical dimensions of physician support for legalised voluntary assisted dying
Publication history
- Received July 15, 2020
- Revised October 5, 2020
- Accepted October 13, 2020
- First published November 12, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 07, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Australian pharmacists’ perspectives on physician-assisted suicide (PAS): thematic analysis of semistructured interviews
- Assisted dying: the ongoing debate
- Spanish regulation of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide
- The revised International Code of Medical Ethics: an exercise in international professional ethical self-regulation
- Conscientious objection and physician-assisted suicide: a viable option in the UK?
- The Cohen problem of informed consent
- Becoming a medical assistance in dying (MAiD) provider: an exploration of the conditions that produce conscientious participation
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Internal morality of medicine and physician autonomy
- Conscientious refusals to refer: findings from a national physician survey