Article Text
Abstract
Conflicts of interests (COI) are typically divided into those that are financial and those that are not. While there is general agreement that financial COIs have a significant impact on decisions and need to be declared and managed, the status of non-financial COIs continues to be disputed. In a recent BMJ feature article it was proposed that religious beliefs should be routinely declared as an interest. The article generated over 41 responses from the medical community and health researchers, which put forward diverse and opposing views. In this paper, we analyse the discourse to shed further light on the reasons put forward for and against declaring religious beliefs. We argue for a middle path in which only material beliefs should be declared, and then only when there are no extenuating circumstances. To this end, we present a framework to help evaluate the materiality of interests that can be used for both financial and non-financial interests.
- interests of health personnel/institutions
- applied and professional ethics
- codes of/position statements on professional ethics
- religious ethics
Data availability statement
Data are available in a public, open access repository.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- interests of health personnel/institutions
- applied and professional ethics
- codes of/position statements on professional ethics
- religious ethics
Data availability statement
Data are available in a public, open access repository.
Footnotes
Contributors NG conceptualised the work, analysed the data and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. MW, IK and WL critically reviewed the work for important intellectual content, helped reconceptualise aspects of the work and contributed to the writing of the final manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Dangers of neglecting non-financial conflicts of interest in health and medicine
- Association between conflicts of interest and favourable recommendations in clinical guidelines, advisory committee reports, opinion pieces, and narrative reviews: systematic review
- Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Managing risk from conflicts of interest in guideline development committees
- The role of religious beliefs in ethics committee consultations for conflict over life-sustaining treatment
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- Medically valid religious beliefs