Article info
PDFFeature article
Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective
- Correspondence to Nina F de Groot, Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HV, The Netherlands; n.f.de.groot{at}vu.nl
Citation
Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective
Publication history
- Received May 5, 2021
- Accepted August 20, 2021
- First published September 11, 2021.
Online issue publication
January 07, 2022
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Public participation in genetic databases: crossing the boundaries between biobanks and forensic DNA databases through the principle of solidarity
- Accessing medical biobanks to solve crimes: ethical considerations
- Forensic DNA databases: genetic testing as a societal choice
- Spanish public awareness regarding DNA profile databases in forensic genetics: what type of DNA profiles should be included?
- Biobanks for non-clinical purposes and the new law on forensic biobanks: does the Italian context protect the rights of minors?
- The retention of forensic DNA samples: a socio-ethical evaluation of current practices in the EU
- Sport and exercise genomics: the FIMS 2019 consensus statement update
- Direct-to-consumer genetic testing
- Disclosure ‘downunder’: misadventures in Australian genetic privacy law
- From proband to provider: is there an obligation to inform genetic relatives of actionable risks discovered through direct-to-consumer genetic testing?