Article info
PDFResponse
Phantom premise and a shape-shifting ism: reply to Hassoun
- Correspondence to Dr Kyle Ferguson, Division of Medical Ethics, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; kyle.ferguson{at}nyulangone.org
Citation
Phantom premise and a shape-shifting ism: reply to Hassoun
Publication history
- Received March 10, 2021
- Accepted March 21, 2021
- First published May 7, 2021.
Online issue publication
January 09, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (9 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Love thy neighbour? Allocating vaccines in a world of competing obligations
- Against vaccine nationalism
- Vaccine nationalism and internationalism: perspectives of COVID-19 vaccine trial participants in the United Kingdom
- Vaccine equity in COVID-19: a meta-narrative review
- Vaccine ethics: an ethical framework for global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines
- Decolonising human rights: how intellectual property laws result in unequal access to the COVID-19 vaccine
- A critical analysis of COVAX alliance and corresponding global health governance and policy issues: a scoping review
- Pandemic preparedness and response: beyond the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator
- Covax must go beyond proportional allocation of covid vaccines to ensure fair and equitable access
- Tracking the uptake and trajectory of COVID-19 vaccination coverage in 15 West African countries: an interim analysis