Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Look for injustice and you’ll probably find it: a commentary on Harcourt’s ‘epistemic injustice, children and mental illness’
  1. Brent Michael Kious
  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Brent Michael Kious, Psychiatry, University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; brent.kious{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

In ‘Epistemic injustice, children and mental Illness,’1 Edward Harcourt uses Miranda Fricker’s concept of testimonial injustice (TI)2 to make sense of claims, from mental health service users, that clinicians do not listen to them. Being listened to matters. It is a sign of respect as a person and associated with better clinical outcomes. TI involves suffering an unfair credibility deficit because of prejudice, so seems like a promising way of understanding service users’ complaints. Harcourt quickly concludes, however, that it is inadequate. Since many service users are not wholly rational, the credibility deficits they suffer could be fair, and thus cannot constitute TI.

Undaunted, Harcourt tries to reimagine TI so it can help. He observes that many children are also unfairly discredited by clinicians. Perhaps they are victims of TI, too, in a way that could help resurrect the concept? It may at first seem not: although providers who work with children often discredit them, this may result from mere ignorance, not prejudice. We should not let clinicians off the hook so easily, however, since they work with children, and should know their real capacities. Since they still discredit children, they must be prejudiced. And even further kinds of TI could be perpetrated by clinicians. Fricker assumes that …

View Full Text


  • Contributors BMK is the sole author of the work.

  • Funding This work was supported by a Greenwall Foundation Faculty Scholars Fellowship (2020–2023).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.