Article info
PDFResponse
Why we should not extend the 14-day rule
- Correspondence to Bruce Philip Blackshaw, Philosophy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; bblackshaw{at}gmail.com
Citation
Why we should not extend the 14-day rule
Publication history
- Received February 10, 2021
- Revised April 21, 2021
- Accepted April 25, 2021
- First published June 10, 2021.
Online issue publication
January 10, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (9 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Going high and low: on pluralism and neutrality in human embryology policy-making
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- The moral status of the embryo post-Dolly
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- The time has come to extend the 14-day limit
- Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a Confucian argument
- Human embryonic stem cells and respect for life
- The person, the soul, and genetic engineering
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies