Article info
Current controversy
Fair and equitable subject selection in concurrent COVID-19 clinical trials
- Correspondence to Dr Tanya L. Zakrison, Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; tzakrison{at}surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu
Citation
Fair and equitable subject selection in concurrent COVID-19 clinical trials
Publication history
- Received June 12, 2020
- Revised September 23, 2020
- Accepted September 27, 2020
- First published October 12, 2020.
Online issue publication
December 22, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (12 October 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage
Other content recommended for you
- Diversity and inclusion for rodents: how animal ethics committees can help improve translation
- Donor-funded research: permissible, not perfect
- More than consent for ethical open-label placebo research
- Equity assessment of childhood immunisation at national and subnational levels in Myanmar: a benefit incidence analysis
- Ethical considerations in international clinical trial site selection
- Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity
- Sharing the benefits of research fairly: two approaches
- Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers
- A Plutocratic Proposal: an ethical way for rich patients to pay for a place on a clinical trial
- Financing for universal health coverage in small island states: evidence from the Fiji Islands