Article Text
PDFCommentary
Considering sex robots for older adults with cognitive impairments
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors AB is the sole author of the commentary and meet all four criteria according to the ICMJE 2018 recommendations of authorship.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities
- Sexuality and intimacy in ALS: systematic literature review and future perspectives
- Sexual function in women undergoing surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a comparison with healthy women
- Sex rights for the disabled
- Whither a Welfare - Funded ’ Sex Doula ' Programme
- Sex robots for older adults with disabilities: reply to critics
- Capabilities and health
- Sexual problems of disabled patients
- In defence of mandatory bicycle helmet legislation: response to Hooper and Spicer
- What Happens After Menopause? (WHAM): protocol for a prospective, multicentre, age - matched cohort trial of risk - reducing bilateral salpingo - oophorectomy in high - risk premenopausal women