Article info
PDFCommentary
Commentary on Jecker
- Correspondence to Prof. Tom Sorell, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, West Midlands, UK; t.sorell{at}warwick.ac.uk
Citation
Commentary on Jecker
Publication history
- Received September 30, 2020
- Accepted October 2, 2020
- First published November 24, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 09, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (9 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities
- Are sex robots enough?
- Sex robots for older adults with disabilities: reply to critics
- Robots and sexual ethics
- A human right to pleasure? Sexuality, autonomy and egalitarian strategies
- Comment on ‘I, Sex Robot: the health implications of the sex robot industry’
- Sex robot fantasies
- Considering sex robots for older adults with cognitive impairments
- I, Sex Robot: the health implications of the sex robot industry
- Sex robots: the irreplaceable value of humanity