Article Text
Commentary
Are sex robots enough?
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @abonisaenz
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities
- Sex robot fantasies
- Commentary on Jecker
- Comment on ‘I, Sex Robot: the health implications of the sex robot industry’
- Robots and sexual ethics
- Sex robots for older adults with disabilities: reply to critics
- I, Sex Robot: the health implications of the sex robot industry
- Considering sex robots for older adults with cognitive impairments
- Sex robots: the irreplaceable value of humanity
- Sixty seconds on . . . sex with robots