Article info
PDFCommentary
Sex robot fantasies
- Correspondence to Dr Robert Sparrow, Philosophy, Monash University, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia; robert.sparrow{at}monash.edu
Citation
Sex robot fantasies
Publication history
- Received October 13, 2020
- Accepted October 14, 2020
- First published November 27, 2020.
Online issue publication
January 09, 2022
Article Versions
- Previous version (9 January 2022).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Nothing to be ashamed of: sex robots for older adults with disabilities
- Are sex robots enough?
- I, Sex Robot: the health implications of the sex robot industry
- Comment on ‘I, Sex Robot: the health implications of the sex robot industry’
- Sex robots for older adults with disabilities: reply to critics
- A human right to pleasure? Sexuality, autonomy and egalitarian strategies
- Robots and sexual ethics
- Commentary on Jecker
- Considering sex robots for older adults with cognitive impairments
- Society must consider risks of sex robots, report warns