Article info
PDFResponse
Age change in healthcare settings: a reply to Lippert-Rasmussen and Petersen
- Correspondence to Joona Räsänen, Department of Philosophy, Classics, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Oslo 0315, Norway; joona.rasanen{at}ifikk.uio.no
Citation
Age change in healthcare settings: a reply to Lippert-Rasmussen and Petersen
Publication history
- Received February 13, 2020
- Accepted February 20, 2020
- First published March 10, 2020.
Online issue publication
August 26, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (10 March 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Age change, official age and fairness in health
- Moral case for legal age change
- What a drag it is getting old: a response to Räsänen
- Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics
- Against the nihilism of ‘ legal age change ’: response to Räsänen
- On legal age change
- Priority dilemmas in dialysis: the impact of old age
- Age - dependent prognostic value of exercise capacity and derivation of fitness - associated biologic age
- Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we do n’t like it and why maybe we should
- Intuitions, principles and consequences