Article info
Response
Age change, official age and fairness in health
- Correspondence to Dr Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Political Science, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; lippert{at}ps.au.dk
Citation
Age change, official age and fairness in health
Publication history
- Received January 21, 2020
- Accepted February 3, 2020
- First published February 13, 2020.
Online issue publication
August 26, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (13 February 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Moral case for legal age change
- Age change in healthcare settings: a reply to Lippert-Rasmussen and Petersen
- What a drag it is getting old: a response to Räsänen
- On legal age change
- Against the nihilism of ‘legal age change’: response to Räsänen
- Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics
- Ageism in cardiology
- COVID-19 raises a health and human rights imperative to advance a UN Convention on the Rights of Older Persons
- Glossaries in public health: older people
- Priority dilemmas in dialysis: the impact of old age