Article info
PDFResponse
The ‘Expiry Problem’ of broad consent for biobank research - And why a meta consent model solves it
- Correspondence to Dr Thomas Ploug, Centre for Applied Ethics and Philosophy of Science, Aalborg University Copenhagen, København S 2450, Denmark; ploug{at}hum.aau.dk
Citation
The ‘Expiry Problem’ of broad consent for biobank research - And why a meta consent model solves it
Publication history
- Received January 31, 2020
- Accepted February 10, 2020
- First published February 25, 2020.
Online issue publication
August 26, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 August 2020).
- Previous version (26 August 2020).
- Previous version (26 August 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Broadening consent—and diluting ethics?
- Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents
- Ethics of dead participants: policy recommendations for biobank research
- International requirements for consent in biobank research: qualitative review of research guidelines
- The biobank consent debate: why ‘meta-consent’ is still the solution!
- Public preferences towards data management and governance in Swiss biobanks: results from a nationwide survey
- Biobank research, informed consent and society. Towards a new alliance?
- Building on relationships of trust in biobank research
- The biobank consent debate: Why ‘meta-consent’ is not the solution?
- Ethical navigation of biobanking establishment in Ukraine: learning from the experience of developing countries