Article Text
Extended essay
The Cohen problem of informed consent
Abstract
To avoid potential abuse and respect patient autonomy, physicians have a moral obligation to obtain informed consent before performing any significant medical intervention. To give informed consent, a patient must be competent, understand her condition, options and their expected risks and benefits and must freely and expressly consent to one of those options. Shlomo Cohen challenges this conception of informed consent by constructing cases based on Edmund Gettier’s classic counterexamples to traditional theories of knowledge. In this paper, I argue Cohen-style cases are not genuine threats to the concept of informed consent, however they provide an interesting challenge to theories of conscientious objection.
- informed consent
- conscientious objection
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- Reasons, reasonability and establishing conscientious objector status in medicine
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Medical students’ attitudes towards conscientious objection: a survey