Article info
Commentary
The legacy of Caster Semenya: examining the normative basis for the construction of categories in sport
- Correspondence to Dr Silvia Camporesi, Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London WC2B 4BG, UK; silvia.camporesi{at}kcl.ac.uk
Citation
The legacy of Caster Semenya: examining the normative basis for the construction of categories in sport
Publication history
- Received July 17, 2020
- Revised July 25, 2020
- Accepted July 27, 2020
- First published August 19, 2020.
Online issue publication
August 26, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 August 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Caster Semenya, athlete classification, and fair equality of opportunity in sport
- When does an advantage become unfair? Empirical and normative concerns in Semenya’s case
- Leveling (down) the playing field: performance diminishments and fairness in sport
- What do we do about women athletes with testes?
- Response to commentaries on ‘Caster Semenya, athlete classification, and fair equality of opportunity in sport’
- Time to re-evaluate gender segregation in athletics?
- On Loland’s conception of fair equality of opportunity in sport
- Sex, health, and athletes
- Sex, gender, and sports
- Serum androgen levels and their relation to performance in track and field: mass spectrometry results from 2127 observations in male and female elite athletes