Article Text
Commentary
The legacy of Caster Semenya: examining the normative basis for the construction of categories in sport
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @silviacamporesi
Contributors SC is the sole author of this article.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵Now renamed World Athletics (since November 2019). For the purposes of this paper I will refer to IAAF.
↵The decision was reached with a two out of three majority in April 2019.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Caster Semenya, athlete classification, and fair equality of opportunity in sport
- When does an advantage become unfair? Empirical and normative concerns in Semenya’s case
- Leveling (down) the playing field: performance diminishments and fairness in sport
- What do we do about women athletes with testes?
- Response to commentaries on ‘Caster Semenya, athlete classification, and fair equality of opportunity in sport’
- Time to re-evaluate gender segregation in athletics?
- On Loland’s conception of fair equality of opportunity in sport
- Sex, health, and athletes
- Sex, gender, and sports
- Serum androgen levels and their relation to performance in track and field: mass spectrometry results from 2127 observations in male and female elite athletes