Article info
Feature article
Caster Semenya, athlete classification, and fair equality of opportunity in sport
- Correspondence to Professor Sigmund Loland, Department of Sport and Social Sciences, The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo 0860, Norway; sigmund.loland{at}nih.no
Citation
Caster Semenya, athlete classification, and fair equality of opportunity in sport
Publication history
- Received November 4, 2019
- Revised February 18, 2020
- Accepted March 3, 2020
- First published July 20, 2020.
Online issue publication
August 26, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (20 July 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Response to commentaries on ‘Caster Semenya, athlete classification, and fair equality of opportunity in sport’
- What do we do about women athletes with testes?
- On Loland’s conception of fair equality of opportunity in sport
- Sex, gender, and sports
- When does an advantage become unfair? Empirical and normative concerns in Semenya’s case
- Sex, money and luck in sport
- A question of ‘fairness’: Why ethics should factor in the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s decision on the IAAF Hyperandrogenism Regulations
- Caster semenya and a level playing field
- Sex and gender issues in competitive sports: investigation of a historical case leads to a new viewpoint
- Collider bias (aka sample selection bias) in observational studies: why the effects of hyperandrogenism in elite women’s sport are likely underestimated