Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Clinical ethics report on the resuscitation of a patient in the emergency department with an uncertain resuscitation status and an implantable cardiac defibrillator
- Correspondence to Mr Gregory Neal-Smith, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK; gregnealsmith{at}doctors.org.uk
Citation
Clinical ethics report on the resuscitation of a patient in the emergency department with an uncertain resuscitation status and an implantable cardiac defibrillator
Publication history
- Received November 18, 2019
- Revised March 11, 2020
- Accepted March 20, 2020
- First published April 6, 2020.
Online issue publication
August 26, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 August 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Patients’ attitudes towards “do not attempt resuscitation” status
- Improving implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation discussions in admitted patients made DNR and comfort care
- Honouring patient's resuscitation wishes: a multiphased effort to improve identification and documentation
- ICDs in end-stage heart failure
- Ethical issues surrounding do not attempt resuscitation orders: decisions, discussions and deleterious effects
- Disparity in implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy among minority South Asians in the United Kingdom
- Improving rates of implantable cardioverter defibrillator deactivation in end-of-life care
- Primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators for patients with heart failure
- Raising the issue of DNAR orders in vascular surgery patients
- 88 The resuscitation status of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients according to electronic health records: are we ignoring the device?