Article Text
Abstract
In a recent extended essay, philosopher Daniel Hausman goes a long way towards dismissing severity as a morally relevant attribute in the context of priority setting in healthcare. In this response, we argue that although Hausman certainly points to real problems with how severity is often interpreted and operationalised within the priority setting context, the conclusion that severity does not contain plausible ethical content is too hasty. Rather than abandonment, our proposal is to take severity seriously by carefully mapping the possibly multiple underlying accounts to well-established ethical theories, in a way that is both morally defensible and aligned with the term’s colloquial uses.
- allocation of health care resources
- distributive justice
- ethics
- health economics
- public health ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @mathbarra; @SEVPRI1
Contributors MBa made the initial draft (in collaboration with CTS) and MBa managed the iteration of revisions by all authors, until all authors were satisfied with the final submitted manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Lifetime QALY prioritarianism in priority setting
- Against proportional shortfall as a priority - setting principle
- Against lifetime QALY prioritarianism
- Ethical issues in funding orphan drug research and development
- Priority setting: learning to make tough decisions
- Using economics to set pragmatic and ethical priorities
- Justice and the NICE approach
- Does accountability for reasonableness work? A protocol for a mixed methods study using an audit tool to evaluate the decision - making of clinical commissioning groups in England
- Priority setting for new systematic reviews: processes and lessons learned in three regions in Africa
- Top research priorities in liver and gallbladder disorders in the UK