Article info
PDFResponse
Response to commentaries on ‘Expressivism at the beginning and end of life’
- Correspondence to Dr Philip Reed, Philosophy, Canisius College, Buffalo, NY 14208, USA; reedp{at}canisius.edu
Citation
Response to commentaries on ‘Expressivism at the beginning and end of life’
Publication history
- Received July 8, 2020
- Accepted July 8, 2020
- First published July 16, 2020.
Online issue publication
July 23, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (23 July 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Expressivism at the beginning and end of life
- Devaluation of persons by biotechnology-facilitated practices at the beginning and at the end of life
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- An autonomy-based approach to assisted suicide: a way to avoid the expressivist objection against assisted dying laws
- Impact of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) on family caregivers
- Canadian French and English newspapers’ portrayals of physicians’ role and medical assistance in dying (MAiD) from 1972 to 2016: a qualitative textual analysis
- Role of non-governmental organisations in physician assisted suicide
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven
- Commentary on ‘expressivism at the beginning and end of life’