Article Text
Abstract
Some disability rights advocates criticise prenatal testing and selective abortion on the grounds that these practices express negative attitudes towards existing persons with disabilities. Disability rights advocates also commonly criticise and oppose physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and euthanasia on the same grounds. Despite the structural and motivational similarity of these two kinds of arguments, there is no literature comparing and contrasting their relative merits and the merits of responses to them with respect to each of these specific medical practices. This paper undertakes such a comparison. My thesis is that a number of potentially significant weaknesses of the expressivist argument against reproductive technologies are avoided when the argument is used against PAS. In particular, I try to show that three common criticisms of the expressivist argument applied to reproductive technologies, whatever merit they have, have even less merit when they are used to reply to the expressivist argument applied to PAS. This is important because the expressivist argument applied to the end of life scenario does not get as much attention as the argument applied to the beginning of life scenario, and yet it has a relatively stronger position.
- euthanasia
- disability
- genetic counselling/prenatal diagnosis
- suicide/assisted suicide
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors PR is the sole and exclusive author of this paper.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement There are no data in this work.
Linked Articles
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Response
Other content recommended for you
- Devaluation of persons by biotechnology-facilitated practices at the beginning and at the end of life
- French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey
- An autonomy-based approach to assisted suicide: a way to avoid the expressivist objection against assisted dying laws
- Discrimination against the dying
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?
- Expressivism at the beginning and end of life
- Commentary on ‘expressivism at the beginning and end of life’
- Legal physician-assisted suicide in Oregon and The Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in vulnerable groups—another perspective on Oregon's data
- Response to commentaries on ‘Expressivism at the beginning and end of life’
- Role of non-governmental organisations in physician assisted suicide