Article Text
Abstract
Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020–2021. Developing and delivering a vaccine may be the most likely way to end the pandemic. If it were possible to shorten this development time by weeks or months, this may have a significant effect on reducing deaths. Phase II and phase III trials could take less long to conduct if they used human challenge methods—that is, deliberately infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation. This article analyses arguments for and against such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees when considering these matters. It concludes that it may be possible to maintain current ethical standards yet still permit human challenge trials in a context where delay is critical. The implications are that regulators and researchers need to work together now to design robust but short trials and streamline ethics approval processes so that they are in place when applications for trials are made.
- research ethics
- public policy
- policy guidelines/Inst
- review boards/review Cttes
- informed consent
- ethics committees/consultation
This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.
https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usageStatistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors ADR was the sole author of this paper.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Exploring the ethics of tuberculosis human challenge models
- Covid-19 vaccines: Should we allow human challenge studies to infect healthy volunteers with SARS-CoV-2?
- Ethical considerations for epidemic vaccine trials
- Limits to research risks
- Research opportunities for the primordial prevention of rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease—streptococcal vaccine development: a national heart, lung and blood institute workshop report
- Qualitative interview study exploring the perspectives of pregnant women on participating in controlled human infection research in the UK
- Understanding paratyphoid infection: study protocol for the development of a human model of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A challenge in healthy adult volunteers
- Reserving coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines for global access: cross sectional analysis
- Estimating vaccine confidence levels among healthcare students and staff of a tertiary institution in South Africa: protocol of a cross-sectional survey
- Covid-19: Human challenge studies will see people purposefully infected with virus